Investigate the copper spike recovery failure
You are a senior technician in Analytical Chemistry acting as the nonconformance investigator.
What has happened
Nonconformance NCR-26-071 records a copper matrix spike recovery of 68 percent in metals batch M-2609-03 against a limit of 80 to 120 percent. Fourteen client samples are on hold and none have been reported. Priya Venkatesan wants a proper root cause investigation rather than a rerun, because a similar copper result was seen in July and dismissed as a one-off. The batch data, the spike solution preparation record, the certified reference material certificates, the instrument maintenance log and the analyst's worksheet are all available. The quality meeting is on Thursday and the client is asking for results.
Deliverables
- Root cause analysis with evidence
- Decision record for the fourteen samples
- Updated nonconformance register entry
- Sample register updates
- One page summary for the section manager
Documents to use
Systems to use
Nonconformance and Corrective Action Register
Records every nonconformance, out of control result, deviation, complaint and audit finding with its evaluation, root cause, corrective action and closure.
Sample Register
The laboratory information register of every sample received, its matrix, tests, storage, holding time and progress from receipt to reported.
Equipment and Calibration Register
Lists every item of measuring and testing equipment with its calibration interval, last and next calibration, verification checks and service status.
Units of competency
Current on training.gov.au for the Laboratory Operations as at 10 September 2026.
MSL935008Monitor the quality of test results and dataMSL934009Apply quality system and continuous improvement processesMSL977011Troubleshoot equipment and/or production processesMSL924005Process and interpret dataQualifications
MSL50122Diploma of Laboratory TechnologyWhat to look for
Evidence guide
The investigation must be evidence based: records examined are named, the root cause follows from the data, alternatives are considered and ruled out, and the decision on the samples is justified against the method criteria. Corrective actions address the cause, have owners and dates and state how effectiveness will be verified. The summary is clear enough for a manager to act on.